Monday 23 August 2010

I wish I'd travelled by bicycle ...

I am on a railway journey.
I have booked my seat.



My seat-reservation is for coach C, seat number 29, facing the direction of travel, and conveniently next to the aisle.
I occupy my seat and, with some difficulty in the limited space, open my broadsheet newspaper.

The train departs.
Leaving behind all that urban graffiti, we cruise through delightful countryside.
Nobody has yet occupied the window-seat, number 28, so I have an uninterrupted view.

The train stops.
There are the usual public announcements –
“Take your belongings …”
“Mind the gap when alighting.”
“Passengers for Wigan must change at Timbuktu!”
Some passengers alight.
New ones get on board.

“Excuse me,” says a large lady pointing to seat number 28, “I think that’s my seat.”
I re-fold my newspaper, arise from my seat and move into the aisle.

Lady has a big suitcase. I offer to place it on the overhead rack.
“Oh, how kind!” says she.
The suitcase is very heavy!

She compacts herself into the seat by the window.
I ignore serious transverse pain in my chest.
Under the irresistible force of gravity, her generous frame, having nowhere else to go, spreads laterally.
I smile and re-occupy seat number 29.
Somehow there doesn’t seem to be quite so much room.

“Are you travelling far?” I enquire in a friendly tone.
“Oh, yes, all the way!” she responds.
I am somewhat alarmed by her broad-gauge smile.

(Did I tell you that this train is the one from Penzance to Newcastle, and we haven’t passed Newton Abbot yet?!)

I re-open my newspaper. I think I’ll settle for one of the tabloids next time, or perhaps a small paperback.

Five minutes after leaving the station the lady asks, “Is there a buffet car on the train?”
“Oh, yes,” say I, (somewhat hesitantly because I can feel what’s coming,) “I think that’s in coach D, further back.”
“Fine,” she says, “I think I’ll pay a visit.”
With my newspaper now in a state of serious disarray, I get out of my seat to allow lady access to the aisle. Lady emerges from her airline-type seat with some difficulty. She heads off towards the front of the train.
I decide to take the opportunity, while standing in the aisle, of reconstructing my newspaper.

Lady realises that coach D is in the opposite direction.
She apologises profusely as she squeezes past me once more.
Coincidentally the train lurches violently over a series of points.
Jiggerley-juggerley-dum-didderley-dum-dudderly-di-jiggerley-jug!
This onomatopoeic interlude accompanies an unforeseen entangling of limbs in order that we both manage to retain an upright posture.
Lady smiles sweetly and asks, “Is there anything you would like?”

Her voluminous bosom threatens to engulf my slender frame.

I blush.
She doesn’t!

“No, thank you!”

I tentatively sit down again, savouring the unworthy hope that there will be a very long queue at the buffet.

I search for my newspaper.
Did I lose it in her cleavage?
I don’t remember!

My earlier hope is not realised. Within minutes lady is once again at my side bearing a brown paper bag bulging with all sorts of artery-clogging goodies in one hand, and a large cup of something liquid, held at a precarious angle, in the other. Our earlier manoeuvrings are reversed. This time there is less physical contact, although some strange fluid has been spilled on my seat.

She sits.
I try to sit.
Now there’s even less room.
My bottom now feels moist.

Lady spreads the contents of her goody-bag over her own fold-down table … and half of mine.
“Would you like something?”
I politely accept ... a crisp. (Eeugh – prawn cocktail!)

To continue a description of this lady's noisy consumption of this pre-packaged repast would be unsavoury and unkind.

Anyway, I think she likes me.
I should be grateful ...
Not many people do!

I am getting irritable.
I've got a wet bum.
I am finding it difficult to breathe, though, thankfully, the chest-pain has gone.
I’d really like my newspaper back.
I daren’t look for it!

Achieving what comfort I can in a restricted space, I engage compassionate and forgiving thoughts while looking at the inside of my eyelids.
I pray for sleep to come.

My repose is soon interrupted ... “I think I need to go - err - you know where.”

Now, visualise this ...
Two fold-down tables full of detritus with nowhere to go, large person with full bladder and a 'need to go' trying to negotiate a small space ... and me ...
I stood no chance!

Once more, after scattering rubbish everywhere, we dance momentarily in the aisle.
She smiles flirtatiously again, while playfully caressing my left nipple.

While she’s away in the loo I pick up my small rucksack from under my seat, abandon all hopes of retrieving my newspaper, (wherever it may be,) and make for the ‘quiet zone’ coach.

This anecdote has a basis in historical fact.
I have made only very slight embellishments to the truth!

Sunday 22 August 2010

About Swan Vestas matches ...

I wonder if anyone else has made this observation ...
Swan Vestas matches aren't what they used to be!


1. They scatter sparks in unpredictable directions causing tale-telling burn marks, (as evidence of your disgusting habit,) in whatever clothing you are wearing.

2. "Average contents - 85." I have never counted them but, by the time you've ignited 32, the striking surface on the box has worn out!

I think I'll chop off the ends, discard the box, and take up matchstick modelling ...

Friday 20 August 2010

About gauges ...

In Victorian times there were two common gauges for the mainline railways of Britain. Most companies adopted what we, in Britain, now refer to as ‘standard gauge’: that is 4ft 8½in between the rail-faces, as above.


My engineering hero, Isambard Kingdom Brunel, here immortalised in bronze, was a man of big ideas.
For his Great Western Railway he insisted upon 7ft 0¼in:



Smaller industrial and rural enterprises, unconnected with main lines, used several different narrower gauges, partly because such gauges permitted tighter curves. On the Isle of Man Railway you'll find 3-foot gauge, and on Welsh mountain railways - 2'3".
Irish Railways, for some contrary reason, (keep the Brits out?) finally ended up with 5ft 3in for their main railway lines.

Brunel’s argument for adopting the broad gauge on the GWR was that it would facilitate higher speeds, improved comfort and greater load-carrying capacity. Wider wheel-based locomotives could accommodate boilers placed lower than their standard gauge counterparts. Thereby a lower centre of gravity would lead to greater stability. Cylinders could be situated between the mainframes, (inside cylinders.) Again, this might have contributed to stability, but one wonders whether reduced accessibility could have created difficulties with maintenance.
That debate: "What if … ?" continues to this day.

Some of Sir Daniel Gooch’s designs for the GWR must have been fire-breathing monsters of their time.
Here's Iron Duke:


Interestingly the permanent way for Brunel’s broad gauge railway consisted of rails supported on longitudinal sleepers, in contrast to the still-familiar transverse sleepers of the standard gauge:


Perhaps the biggest problem that signalled the demise of broad gauge was the time, labour and inconvenience involved in transhipment of passengers and freight between the rolling stock of rivalling companies:


After 1864, when the British parliament accepted advice from ‘the gauge commission’ that 4ft 8½in should be adopted nationally, there was some dalliance with mixed gauge, but 1892 saw the final demise of Brunel’s broad gauge as the last broad gauge train left Swindon:


Notice the longitudinally-sleepered broad gauge track on the right, mixed gauge with intricate point-work/crossings in the centre, and standard gauge to the left.

Isn't all that terribly interesting?
My next project will be about bridges.
The terms 'cantilever', 'suspension', 'box-girder' and 'truss' come to mind!


Sunday 15 August 2010

Using a Senior Railcard ...

There are some advantages to being of advanced age.

Recently, at a small cost, I acquired my Senior Railcard. This entitles me to substantial discounts on off-peak rail travel.



On Monday I plan to travel from Chichester to Didcot, a distance of 88 miles.
The return rail journey will cost me less than £25.00.
That’s only about 7p. per mile.
(Perhaps not many people want to go to Didcot.)

I do!

I even booked my tickets on-line and was able to collect them from my local station.
Isn’t that remarkable?




For years I have wanted to visit The Didcot Railway Centre which houses a collection of Great Western Railway locomotives and rolling stock. I acknowledge that such an excursion may not have widespread appeal, but if you’re over 60, admission costs only £4.50 instead of £5.00. This just gets better!




What more could a senior citizen want?

Here’s a train journey, a piece of industrial heritage and respite from housework, all for less than £30.

Perhaps I’ll repeat the expedition on Tuesday!

(For a slide-show of my visit click Didcot slide-show)